Translate

Monday, December 31, 2012

The Perks of Being a Wallflower. Quick Late Review




The Perks of Being a Wallflower.

Cast:  Ezra Miller, Emma Watson

Writer and Director: Stephen Chbosky


* and a 1/2 out of four



Freshman student Charlie (Logan Lerman) is having problems fitting in at High School.  Everyone including his siblings seem to ignore him while he is there.  During a football game he runs into a kid from his workshop class named Patrick(Ezra Miller) and his step sister Sam (Emma Watson).  They both decide to take him along to parties and other activities to make him feel wanted.  It is a typical coming of age movie until the climax which suddenly turns it into a thriller for no real reason unless you read the book.  Oh boy it looks like I'm going to have alot more negative instead of positive thoughts on this one.


High school was never an easy time for me.  I got my fair share of being picked on, and was awkward around certain people, but this main character kind of bothered me throughout this.  It wasn't that he was shy, I just never found his whole ordeal to be all that interesting. It was sad hearing about the death of his best friend because I too lost someone close and can somewhat understand his torment a little.  I just never understood why both Patrick and Sam would want to befriend him except for the fact they feel sorry for him.  He wants so bad to make sure that everyone likes him he forgets how to make himself happy.  Near the end of this feature,Charlie goes from quiet and shy to loud and dangerous so fast I thought a different movie had started.  I understand that he has had a rough life, but wish that reveal would have came a little bit more earlier then it did

The Supporting cast of both Ezra Miller("We Need to Talk About Kevin") and Emma Watson(The "Harry Potter" franchise) was really good.  I wished the focus would have been more on them, because I found their stories to be just as interesting if not more then the main one. Charlie is very much in love with Sam, but I never understood why she would be interested in him.  His attraction to her makes sense because she was the first girl who spoke to him without calling him names. But what was it about this kid that made Sam want to kiss him.  The romantic angle felt really out of place and very unnecessary.  Another subplot that felt superfluous to me was the one about Patrick being gay and having a secret affair with a popular student.  I have no issue with the character being a homosexual but the focus seems to concentrate more on his sexual orientation rather then his true persona.  The movie does feature some good cameos from Paul Rudd as an English Teacher to make up wizard Tom Savini as a wood and metal shop one.  Charlie even claims the English Teacher to be one of the best which is confusing because I never saw him really teach him anything.  He just gave this kid some books.  Was it that line he mentioned and I'm paraphrasing.

"We accept the love we think we deserve to have".


It's a good statement but I never felt  that either Sam nor Charlie got the love they deserve.  Their relationship was more of a friendship then a romantic one.   I admire that Stephen Chbosky adapted his own book and even directed it, but he really could have used some outside opinion to make the story flow a little better.




9 comments:

  1. Better late than never. Great review Vern. I loved this flick just about from start to finish and felt like every opportunity they took with this story, was heartfelt and realistic, unlike any other teen-dramedy you see nowadays.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's better, but not much of an improvement either. It just didn't speak to me. There had to be something about the main character Sam found so appealing that was not shown. Thank you for your thoughts

      Delete
  2. Nooooo Vern. 1 and 1/2 stars? I'm disappointed!

    I can't argue with your reasons though. I was so caught up in the story and the likenesses to John Hughes movies of the past that I couldn't help but love the film.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry I disappointed you Ben.

      I was glad to see that Emma Watson can act beyond the Harry Potter franchise. Thank you for your thoughts

      Delete
  3. I haven't seen this yet but I've been dying too - so it's a shame to hear that it was disappointing! But seems like you have totally valid reasons for the disappointment. I'll definitely have to watch it sooner rather than later. ~Misty, Cinema Schminema

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's been on a bunch of top ten lists, and I don't falut anyone for liking it. It just didn't work for me. Thanks for reading

      Delete
  4. Even though I liked the film, you're right about everything in this review. I'm just glad to see Emma Watson land a role after the Harry Potter series :) haha

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She seems to be the only child cast member who has a future after those films.

      Delete
  5. Filmmaker Chbosky constructs a tight, confined microcosm for them where the outside world never intrudes.

    ReplyDelete

LAMMY NOMINATED

LAMMY NOMINATED
BEST PODCAST